[RQ-Rules] Skills question

[Bjorn Stolen]

>You'd probably quite like the UK's Gathering (largest festival LARP): it
>has a thin veneer of rules, but fundamentally all a characters significant
>capabilities (actual skill with weapons, ability to bluff or con people)
>are the players innate ability (less whatever degree of handicap they
>choose to impose on themselves, if any). It is, at least, consistent; one
>of it's few merits as a system IME, but that's a separate issue...

I probably wouldn't.
You misunderstand me.
My point is that a rules system should be consiquent; either do it as the 
way you describe above, or to allow for skill rolls for weapons AND social 
rolls.

Because people can know as little of social stuff as they can know of 
martial stuff, and rulessystems should not treat theese two areas different 
= rules must be consiquent.

_________________________________________________________________
Last ned MSN Messenger gratis http://www.msn.no/computing/messenger - Den 
raskeste veien mellom deg og dine venner