[RQ-Rules] New RQ

Nick.Middleton at invensys.com Nick.Middleton at invensys.com
Mon Jul 4 06:20:17 PDT 2005



>> Any statement lie this has me worried. While I am sure everyone would
love
>> updated and new RQ material, I think we all fear the butchering of core
>> rules at the same time.
>>
>> Looked on Mongooses site and found this forum, not much help
>> http://www.mongoosepublishing.com/forum.php
>
>Doing a search with the string 'runequest' on their sites yields the
>following: Gloranthan rolegame, new system.

ah, but according to Greg Stafford's own post at RPGNet it's _not_ a new
system: it's the old one re-written just enough to avoid Copyright
issues...

Does this bother anyone else as much as it does me?

>Now do we need YET ANOTHER Gloranthan rolegame??????

A Gloranthan game for the masses I can see working, I wouldn't even object
(well, not much anyway) to it being called RuneQuest: Mongoose could, for
example, have used tri-stat, which they have apparently acquired the rights
to. But this leaves a rather unpleasant taste in my mouth...

Cheers,

Nick Middleton.





More information about the RQ-Rules mailing list