[RQ-Rules] Re: New RQ
Stephen Perrin
steve at perrinworlds.com
Mon Jul 11 19:27:02 PDT 2005
Dreamer
----- Original Message -----
From: "J and/or Ellen" <jellen at ameritech.net>
To: "RuneQuest rules discussion." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [RQ-Rules] Re: New RQ
> Hey, wouldn't it be neat if MRQ actually had runes or quests being
> integral
> to the game?
>
> --J
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Smart" <jurrubin at earthlink.net>
> To: "RuneQuest rules discussion." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 8:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [RQ-Rules] Re: New RQ
>
>
> Exactly. I'd rather see some adventures and world content that's
> compatible
> with the BRP rules. Or at least easily converted.
>
> David
>
>
> Alban posted:
>
> Right now, I see no reason to ditch my own version of BRPS in favor of
> this
> new RQ.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules
> http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rq-rules
>
More information about the RQ-Rules
mailing list