[Rq-rules] Death by a thousand web failures ?

[devinc at aol.com]

Ah, brings back the good old days!
 
For the record, Pete, I appreciate your belated comments on the Scholars ruining the game. As you may remember, I was the person who first introduced the whole Scholars and Players divide in RQ and eventually got hounded out of the RQ Digest mailing list because of it.
 
Devin 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Maranci <pmaranci at gmail.com>
To: murfnmurf at suscom.net <murfnmurf at suscom.net>; RuneQuest-Rules <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
Sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:05:17 -0500
Subject: Re: [Rq-rules] Death by a thousand web failures ?


Eh. I probably shouldn't have mentioned it, although I AM still a bit annoyed. It was all quite public, anyway.

Here's the key section of the thread:
http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=203416&page=57

And here's Stafford's post:
http://forum.rpg.net/showpost.php?p=4295412&postcount=564

It's not all that interesting, actually. It changed my opinion of Greg Stafford, but that's just...my opinion.

I hope that eventually I'll get over it and go back to working on RQ some time. But so far, I just can't bring myself to do it.

Which is no great loss for anyone, I'm sure.


On 11/21/05, murfnmurf at suscom.net < murfnmurf at suscom.net> wrote: 
My site's still up too. Although I haven't updated it in
quite a while;
sorry about that, but ever since that little incident 
with Stafford, I've
had zero enthusiasm for RuneQuest.
->Peter


   Hiya Peter,
   What incident did you have with Mr. Stafford?
  -Ken-


-- 
Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm 
_______________________________________________
RQ-Rules mailing list
RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20051121/d6f82719/attachment-0002.html