[Rq-rules] Re: Continuum 2006/Darkshade Gaming new RQ stock

[Simon Phipp]

Tom Zunder:
  > Well the new Mongoose will be out then as well. If not then 
> we can still playtest it!
   
  I'll be buying it, finances permitting, but I hope that it is better than the last playtest version.
  
>> Yes, I am almost certainly going. I'll play some RQ with pleasure, but nobody
>> wants to play in anything I try to run, so I've given up :-(
> I would, you know that. This year I am not doing any 
> freeforms so I can run and play table top games.
   
  I might run something, then. Or play something. Or something.
   
  >> http://www.darksidegaming.com/
  The link doesn't work, so I can't tell where it is based. Probably not the UK, so I'll stick with Wayland's Forge.
   
  Andrew Larsen:
  > Aaiee! Lost City of Eldarad! Run away!

  > True. It makes good tinder for starting a fire. Seriously, I remember
> digging through it looking for material that could be taken out and used in
> another setting, and found roughly 1 item that had promise.

  Is it really that bad? I recently bought Daughters of Darkness (it was cheap and available, what can I say?) and it wasn't bad. It wasn't good but it had some scenario ideas that could work in Pavis, say.
   
  Is Lost City of Eldarad really worse than Daughters of Darkness?
   
  Come to think of it, what are the worst RQ supplements out there? I can think of a few.
   
  Trolls and Trollkin
  Militia and Mercenaries (if that's what it's called)
  Hell Pits of Night Fang (although I ran it in Pavis and it worked OK)
  Daughters of Darkness
  RQ3 Character Sheets (how anyone thought it would be a good idea to sell them, I can't imagine)
   
  See Ya
   
  Simon
   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20060227/d5f5b2d3/attachment-0002.html