[Rq-rules] Runequestpt

[Mark Mesek]

<Coming out of Lurker mode>

Thanks for the update to Alban, Tom, and Steve Perrin. So it looks like
there is still hope (even though I'm a bit disappointed that Steve isn't
involved with the final stage of development).

Good to find all of you here, btw.

Mark M.

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Alban de ROSTOLAN <aluban at yahoo.fr>
> An: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
> Betreff: Re: [Rq-rules] Runequestpt
> Datum: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:03:20 +0100 (CET)
> 
> "Tom Zunder (Home)" <tom at zunder.org.uk> a écrit :
>   On 28 Feb 2006 at 9:15, Nick.Middleton at invensys.com wrote:
> 
> > Can I just say, given how snippy Matt Sprange got when various people
> > (including myself) queried why early iterations were changing things
> from
> > RQII/III (for no good reason, as far as we could see), that I find this
> > _deeply_ ironic?
> I have it. Let's say Ken did a good job, it's a slightly 
> different version of RQ2/3 with Steve's new and interesting 
> RuneMagic rules. It's good since RQ is good, it has little 
> that is radically different, even the new Strike Ranks and 
> Combat Actions are ok, although much more like D&D. 
> You can use the stat blocks with any BRP with minimal 
> roleplayers sense. The opening text about the radical 
> overhaul and modernisation is a bit of a laugh tho', but 
> then again for a d20 player this is still a leap forward.
>   I'm also one of the few ones that got it, and my opinion is similar to
> yours. It is not perfect, and some of the changes I expected were not
> included, but it is far better than version 1.5.
> 
> 		
> ---------------------------------
>  Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les
> tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.Téléchargez
la
> version beta.

-- 
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++