[Rq-rules] Question about multicast

[David Smart]

But then how would this count as actively concentrating on each spell?

I guess it comes down to whether or not Multispell effectively acts to make all spells being cast a single uber spell or Multispell performs as an "energy bucket" that holds some spells in abeyance until all are ready to be cast and each spell affected by the Multispell roll is still considered a separate, unique spell.

Thoughts?

David

-----Original Message-----
>From: Leon Kirshtein <leonbk at yahoo.com>
>Sent: Jan 12, 2006 8:46 AM
>To: rq-rules at crashbox.com
>Subject: Re: Re: [Rq-rules] Question about multicast
>
>This what I was going to suggest, but it seems you
>beat me to it.
>
>Leon
>--- rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com
><phl0nje at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Actually, one additional thought. You could
>multispell it, and then use one at a
>> time. So don't use all five at once, but keep all
>five 'going' and look through
>> one sight at a time. That'd be generally good for
>sentry purposes.
>> 
>> Nikk
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> RQ-Rules mailing list
>> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
>> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>_______________________________________________
>RQ-Rules mailing list
>RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
>http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules