[Rq-rules] Question about multicast

[Leon Kirshtein]

In a same way as you can look at a split screen
monitor.

Leon
--- rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com
<jurrubin at earthlink.net> wrote:
> But then how would this count as actively
concentrating on each spell?
> 
> I guess it comes down to whether or not Multispell
effectively acts to make all spells being cast a
single uber spell or Multispell performs as an "energy
bucket" that holds some spells in abeyance until all
are ready to be cast and each spell affected by the
Multispell roll is still considered a separate, unique
spell.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Leon Kirshtein <leonbk at yahoo.com>
> >Sent: Jan 12, 2006 8:46 AM
> >To: rq-rules at crashbox.com
> >Subject: Re: Re: [Rq-rules] Question about
multicast
> >
> >This what I was going to suggest, but it seems you
> >beat me to it.
> >
> >Leon
> >--- rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com
> ><phl0nje at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> Actually, one additional thought. You could
> >multispell it, and then use one at a
> >> time. So don't use all five at once, but keep all
> >five 'going' and look through
> >> one sight at a time. That'd be generally good for
> >sentry purposes.
> >> 
> >> Nikk
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RQ-Rules mailing list
> >> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> >> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around 
> >http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >_______________________________________________
> >RQ-Rules mailing list
> >RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> >http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com