[Rq-rules] Re: Clive's Questions

Leon Kirshtein leonbk at yahoo.com
Sun May 21 16:13:30 PDT 2006



--- Nikk Effingham <phl0nje at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:

> > Next question: 2pts or 3pts for the following rune
> spell:
> >
> > PIN VAMPIRE
> >
> > 2pts, ranged, nonstackable, reusable
> >
> > The caster must overcome the vampire in a MPvsMP
> roll, if
> > successful then for the duration of the spell the
> vampire
> > is unable to transform into any of the alternative
> shapes available to it eg:
> > bat, rat, wolf, cloud of mist etc
> >
> > If already in one of these forms it is unable to
> return to humanoid form.
> 
> Nice spell. I'd say one point, not two or three. 

I am thinking 1 point as well. And, I am thinking
making it Stackable, with each addtional point adding
+25% to your chance of success, similar to the
Blinding spell.  My thinking is that vampires are
likely to have a huge amount of MPs so overcoming one
with just ones POW will be very unlikely.

Leon

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the RQ-Rules mailing list