[Rq-rules] Re: RQ-Rules Digest, Vol 9, Issue 15

Paul Cardwell carpgachair at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 10 07:34:16 PDT 2006


--- Julian Lord <julian.lord at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm sad to see that Mongoose appear not to have
> taken things to their
> logical conclusion Stat-wise, and defined all stats
> (for human PCs) as 2D6+6
> (although I still think that human female SIZ and
> STR should be lower, maybe
> 2D6+4 and 2D6+3 respectively) - the 3D6 range for
> humans skews things at the
> lower end of the scale (ie not just the newtlings
> and ducks, but the humans
> as compared to the trolls and giants ... )
> 
Or go the Mythworld route: if high in STR and SIZ
compared to CON and DEX, it is male; if opposite, it
is female; if a mix, go with the feel or make it
whatever is in the shorter supply.  Different species
have different roll numbers, particularly for SIZ.

Paul Cardwell

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the RQ-Rules mailing list