[Rq-rules] Mongoose Runequest

[Adam Canning]

> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:43:16 -0500
> From: "David Smart" <jurrubin at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rq-rules] Mongoose Runequest
> To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
> Message-ID:
> 	<1c92296e0607261143p1381439ma0d67b25124f702c at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> But, in your opinion, do the new team tests and assistance rules alone make
> the book a worthwhile purchase?

As I understand it the SRD will be going up in a week or two. 
Printing out the appropriate pages [20 and 22] is a better Idea.

Especially since I'm not entirely sure how to integrate them with the 
traditional experience system.

> Exactly my view. Actually, not actually 'like' but 'know'.
> They just are such d20 people that it colours their whole outlook.
> Still it isn't too terrible is it.

Sprange claimed to know nothing about the plans for a new BRP when it 
was mentioned.

But then he seems to have had a heavy turnover of staff recently. So 
that might explain why he thought that the concerns of people who 
have played the game for years should be brushed off by "They''ve 
only seen half of it."

> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:13:41 +0100
> From: Thomas Zunder <tom at zunder.org.uk>

> 
> It's so difficult.
> On a public level it's great they're publishing RQ again.
> On a private level it's not quite the game I'd have liked.

If you loose the quite I might agree. Apparantly the EWF and 
Godlearner rules are planned to be unbalanced with everythinng else.
-- 
Adam Canning