[Rq-rules] Mongoose Runequest

[Peter Maranci]

I can't speak for anyone else, but I will continue to be a grumpy Id man.
Although I'm not 100% sure what that means. :D

I'm looking forward to DBRP, though...if it ever comes out. Certainly
Mongoose seems to have lived *down* to my expectations, so maybe Chaosium
will exceed my hopes.

On 7/27/06, Thomas Zunder <tom at zunder.org.uk> wrote:
>
> No, it's very much RuneQuest. Not quite the same, but definitely a RQ.
> We need to decide, do we want to be grumpy ld men or not?
> Give it a fair trial, forget the playtest, see how it plays..
>
> On 27 Jul 2006, at 16:04, Nick.Middleton at invensys.com wrote:
>
> >> One of the key concepts of the original RQ was that everybody had
> >> access
> >> to some kind of magic for their daily lives. I wonder how they can
> >> call
> >> it RuneQuest if this isn't the case.
> >
> > Because Mongoose have paid Issaries Inc a tidy sum (with probably a
> > per
> > book component) for the right to use the Trademark...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Nick Middleton
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RQ-Rules mailing list
> > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> > http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>

-- 
Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
The Diary of An Invisible Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20060727/5f7920e9/attachment.html