[Rq-rules] Mongoose Runequest

[Sven Lugar]

Despite your dismissive & deriding comments (bordering on insulting - 
but that's been par for Mongoose) of those of us who don't feel the way 
the "Company Flack" does, we have given MRQ a fair trial & we found it 
wanting. I prefer to be a "grumpy old man" & either use my old copies or 
use DBRP which so far seems to integrate the original with it's variants 
in its mechanics & spirit. If I wanted to play a D20 variant (despite 
Mongoose labeling it RuneQuest), I would buy a D20 variant.

Takk,
Sven

Thomas Zunder wrote:

> No, it's very much RuneQuest. Not quite the same, but definitely a RQ.
> We need to decide, do we want to be grumpy ld men or not?
> Give it a fair trial, forget the playtest, see how it plays..
>
> On 27 Jul 2006, at 16:04, Nick.Middleton at invensys.com wrote:
>
>>> One of the key concepts of the original RQ was that everybody had  
>>> access
>>> to some kind of magic for their daily lives. I wonder how they can  
>>> call
>>> it RuneQuest if this isn't the case.
>>
>>
>> Because Mongoose have paid Issaries Inc a tidy sum (with probably a  per
>> book component) for the right to use the Trademark...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Nick Middleton
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RQ-Rules mailing list
>> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
>> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>