[Rq-rules] I get knocked down - but I get up again...

[David Smart]

Absolutely. In fact, I use different styles of Martial Arts and one of them
expands upon the Tumbling capabilities, replacing it completely for any
character who has studied that style.

In my mind, Tumbling is better versus large aggressors while Jumping works
better versus small aggressors. Trying to Jump past a 10m tall giant or
Tumble past a large gorp are just different synonyms for "suicide".

On 10/10/06, Roger Benham <rog_benham at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I suppose Jump or Martial Arts could be figured in as well instead of
> Tumbling?
>
>  ------------------------------
> From:  *"David Smart" <jurrubin at gmail.com>*
> Reply-To:  *"Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>*
> To:  *"Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>*
> Subject:  *Re: [Rq-rules] I get knocked down - but I get up again...*
> Date:  *Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:57:18 -0500*
> >Exactly. I did look at Harn but decided to implement a more limited
> >version, hence Tumbling. It's based more on Judo-type rolls rather
> >than the gymnastics of Hollywood.
> >_______________________________________________
> >RQ-Rules mailing list
> >RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> >http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Hotmail is evolving - be one of the first to try out the Windows Live™
> Mail Beta <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUK/2734??PS=47575>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20061010/86ecdddc/attachment.html