[Rq-rules] Re: RQ-Rules Digest, Vol 12, Issue 3

[Lev Lafayette]

--- Julian Lord <julian.lord at gmail.com> wrote:

> Lev :
> 
> On 9/1/06, rq-rules-request at crashbox.com
> <rq-rules-request at crashbox.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Perhaps RQ IV will fall into the sidelines after a
> few
> > months and we'll go back to discussing RQ II and
> III
> > rules systems. For the time being, given that it
> has
> > just been released, it is inevitable that there
> will
> > be  discussion on RQ IV.
> 
> 
> Still playing catch-up, so don't know if this has
> been mentioned, but
> MRQ is actually RQ6
> 
> RQ4 was the aborted and unpublished RQ:AiG
> 
> RQ5 was the aborted and unpublished
> RuneQuest:Slayers
> 
> Ideas from both versions have, as far as I can see,
> made it into RQ6
> 

RQ: AiG is unpublished and therefore doesn't get a
number.

Slayers had nothing to do with the game RQ and whilst
it is an interesting game it is own right, has never
been considered an intrinsic part of RQ discussion
groups afiak.

(and yes, I have read both RQ: AiG and RQ Slayers)

Ergo, I'm sticking with describing Mongoose's
publication as RQ IV.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com