[Rq-rules] Re: Getting rid of Junk Tag

[Steve Davies]

Sorry to use list bandwidth to resolve transmission
problems, but:

This, and the original message to which I responded,
both came into my normal yahoo inbox, not to my junk
folder.  Neither inbound message had a *** JUNK MAIL
*** flag on it.

I'm getting the digest, so when I responded to the
first message (and this one) I hit reply, deleted most
of the body of the message, and changed the Subject. 
For this message, I changed the subject to "Re:
Getting rid of Junk Tag" nothing else is on the
subject line.  I sent the message to
"rq-rules at crashbox.com"

I suspect that this will now get a "*** JUNK MAIL ***"
extra tag on it when it goes to the list.  

Oh, I also BCCed myself on the last e-mail (and will
on this again).  In my inbox, the bcc message did NOT
have the *** JUNK MAIL *** tag in the subject.  So I
suspect that the tag is being added at the crashbox
end.

Thanks for help figuring this out
Steve


> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:37:23 -0800 (PST)
> From: Paul Cardwell <carpgachair at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rq-rules] Egads Junk Mail?
> To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules."
> <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
> Message-ID:
> <907171.28877.qm at web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> My rq-rules have come through my regular route
> without
> problems other than the offensive junk mail tag.  I
> do
> recall having to mark a large number of postings in
> my
> bulk mail as "not spam" to get them there, however.
> 
> Try this:
> When replying to a post with the junk mail tag on
> it,
> first remove the offending designation from the
> Subject line.
> 
> Then post your comments as usual.
> 
> If this post goes through without the junk mail
> reappearing, you will know it works.  If not, you
> will
> know Yahoo is sticking it on and should be contacted
> by the rq-rules moderator to cut that out.
> 
> If the tag has been removed on this post, any
> replies
> to this thread should also be without the tag.
> 
> Go and do likewise to any other tagging you find
> offensive.
> 
> Paul Cardwell
>