[Rq-rules] Review of Snake Pipe Hollow

[Christopher Fasulo]

I always thought it would be a good place for a RQ Keep On The Borderlands 
with the caves of chaos being the hollow
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gianni" <gianni at basicrps.com>
To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Rq-rules] Review of Snake Pipe Hollow


OTOH Mongoose said they might consider Gloranthan submissions for
Signs&Portents.

G.

----- Original Message -----
From: Nick.Middleton at wrsl.com
To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
Sent: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:27:00 +0100
Subject: Re: [Rq-rules] Review of Snake Pipe Hollow

> "Serpent Fife Depression"?
> "Ophidian Recorder Dip"?
>
> :D
>
> Nick Middleton
>
>
>
>      "Peter Maranci"
>      <pmaranci at gmail.c
>      om> To
>      Sent by:        "Discussion of RuneQuest rules."
>      rq-rules-bounces@        <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
>      crashbox.com cc
>
>    Subject
>      30/04/2007 13:18        Re: [Rq-rules] Review of Snake Pipe
>        Hollow
>
>      Please respond to
>       "Discussion of
>      RuneQuest rules."
>      <rq-rules at crashbo
>   x.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> No, Lev, no! If once you start down the dark path, forever will it 
> dominate

> your destiny!
>
> Seriously, why not pull a Mongoose? Create your own version of Snake Pipe
> Hollow using other words, and use RQIII (or *cough*, CBRP/d100) for the
> system. You could call it "Reptile Flute Basin"! :D
>
> ->Peter
>
> On 4/30/07, Lev Lafayette <lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> I must admit it was precisely this which inspired by
> questions about Mongoose/RQ licensing.
>
> I would really love to do an "Snake Pipe Hollow
> Expanded" setting and campaign pack.
>
> Maybe I'll have to do it for (sotto voce) HeroQuest...
>
> --- Nikk Effingham < phl0nje at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > I think it's on topic. To be honest, I never hold
> > Snake Pipe Hollow in great
> > esteem - perhaps when it was first produced it was a
> > good product, but times
> > moved on and the reprintings of Snake Pipe didn't.
> > It still remained a huge
> > dungeon bash which, whilst relatively fun, didn't
> > blow my mind. Still, I can
> > imagine a really fantastic campaign set in and
> > around Snake Pipe, perhaps
> > expanding upon the scant location descriptions that
> > each edition just
> > tantalised us with.
> >
> > IMO,
> >
> > Nikk
> >
> > >
> > > OK, this is possibly *slightly* off-topic, but I
> > > recently did a review of Snake Pipe Hollow. It's
> > > available here:
> > >
> > > http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/12/12938.phtml
> > >
> > > I also did a review of AD&Ds "Tomb of Horrors" at
> > the
> > > same time, although that is a little like shooting
> > > fish in the proverbial...
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > >  http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RQ-Rules mailing list
> > > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> > >  http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RQ-Rules mailing list
> > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> > http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
> Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying!  http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
> The Diary of An Invisible Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>
>
>
>
> Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked with virus
detection
> software prior to transmission but you should carry out your own virus
check
> before opening any attachment. WRSL does not accept liability for any
damage
> or loss which may be caused by software viruses. The contents of this
e-mail
> and any attachments are the property of WRSL and are intended for the
> confidential use by the named recipient only. They may be legally
privileged
> and should not be communicated to, or relied upon, by any other person
> without written consent. If you are not the addressee, please notify us
> immediately at the following address:  Westinghouse Rail Systems Ltd
(WRSL),
> PO Box 79, Pew Hill, Langley Park, Chippenham, Wiltshire, SN15 1JD - Tel
> 01249 441441
> Westinghouse Rail Systems Ltd  is a subsidiary of  Invensys Plc.
Registered
> office: Portland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF.
> Registered in England and Wales No. 1641421. 
> _______________________________________________
RQ-Rules mailing list
RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules