[Rq-rules] Re: New Runequest Question

[Lev Lafayette]

;-) Yes, "the other" RQ4 was looking quite good
indeed..

--- Guy Hoyle <ghoyle1 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Because it was never published? Because the
> Gift-carriers of the Sending 
> Gods hunt down anybody who has ever seen a copy of
> --- UUURRKKK!
> 
> Guy (Hoyle)
> 
> DevinC at aol.com wrote:
> > I have a copy of RQ 4 at home and it seems like it
> is a very nice 
> > system. I don't know why many RQers are not
> playing that system.
> >  
> > Devin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > See what's free at AOL.com
> <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503>.
> > 
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > RQ-Rules mailing list
> > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> > http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com