Vedr. Re: [Rq-rules] RQ/Glorantha licensing

[John Pare']

I am surely not denying that, as I have seen good worlds for it.  Conan is 
one.  I also have seen Runequest Talquest (Greyhawk), and several others.  
Hell, you can go Runequest in The Old World of Warhammer Fantasy.

But in all, the name Runequest has become synonymous (spelling?) with 
Glorantha.  A world created specifically for it...  I know, there was also 
Vikings, Feudal Japan, Griffon Mountain, and others (produced for 
Runequest).

John






>From: Wayne Shaw <shaw at caprica.com>
>Reply-To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
>To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
>Subject: RE: Vedr. Re: [Rq-rules] RQ/Glorantha licensing
>Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 10:15:47 -0700
>
>
>>Some games are best played on the worlds they are created for....   Like 
>>RQ, Strombringer,  Warhammer Fantasy Original (NOT
>
>I'm not sure I'm quite parsing you here, but if you're suggesting that RQ 
>is best served being used only for Glorantha, I quite have to disagree in 
>the strongest terms; while there might be some world specific features 
>embodied in the magical systems of RQ (though that was less true of RQ3), I 
>think as an engine I've seen it serve a wide array of fantasy games quite 
>well over the years, and have no sign it _particularly_ well served 
>Glorantha.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RQ-Rules mailing list
>RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
>http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules

_________________________________________________________________
Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more.  Visit MSN In 
Concert today. http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline