*** JUNK MAIL ***Vedr. Re: Vedr. [Rq-rules] Signs & Portents

[Wayne Shaw]

At 11:06 AM 7/30/2007, you wrote:
>Mongoose RuneQuest is quite inferior to the Classical RuneQuest. I 
>was very entusiastic when it came out and have almost all their 
>books. I haven't played a single session though, and probably never 
>will. The quality of their products is pretty bad.
>
>But you're right. This isn't the place to discuss MRQ's failings, 
>but the brilliance of classical RuneQuests!

As far as I understood it, this list is about all versions of RQ.  Am 
I in error?