Vedr. Re: *** JUNK MAIL ***Vedr. Re: Vedr. [Rq-rules] Signs & Portents

[sverre larne]

You might be right as there is no clear description of the supposed content for this list. I think it should be about brilliance of the true RuneQuest though. I do enough MRQ bashing on the MRQ forum. ;-)
   
  SGL.
   
  

Wayne Shaw <shaw at caprica.com> skrev:
  At 11:06 AM 7/30/2007, you wrote:
>Mongoose RuneQuest is quite inferior to the Classical RuneQuest. I 
>was very entusiastic when it came out and have almost all their 
>books. I haven't played a single session though, and probably never 
>will. The quality of their products is pretty bad.
>
>But you're right. This isn't the place to discuss MRQ's failings, 
>but the brilliance of classical RuneQuests!

As far as I understood it, this list is about all versions of RQ. Am 
I in error?

_______________________________________________
RQ-Rules mailing list
RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules



GBC's Portal to Glorantha - http://www.runequest-glorantha.com
  GBC's RuneQuest Links & Glorantha Links - http://www.runequest.info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20070730/a3bef98b/attachment-0001.html