[Rq-rules] Re: Signs & Portents

[Lev Lafayette]

--- Simon Phipp <soltakss at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Personally, I have no problems with the so-called
> provenance of RQM. I wish the quality was better and
> that they had more scenario packs and better maps
> and their rules hung together properly, but any RQ
> is better than no RQ.

WTF? If the RQ trademark fell into the hands of morons
and they published the worst roleplaying game in the
history of gaming you think that would be better than
RQ not being in print?

> I know you're going to say "Wait until DBRP comes
> out", but I can't see DBRP getting the kind of
> support or publishing the number of supplements that
> RQM has. So, DBRP might be a good system, if a bit
> bloated, but it won't be as strong as RQM.

Why not? Chaosium has produced quite a lot of games in
the past with excellent circulation. DBRP may be just
the shot in the arm they need.

All the best,


Lev


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469