Vedr. Re: Vedr. [Rq-rules]Signs & Portent

[sverre larne]

Do you feel MRQ is part of the "true" RQ-family? I don't, but then I don't consider bad RQ to be better than no RQ either.
   
  SGL.
   
  

Styopa <styopa1 at gmail.com> skrev:
  On 7/30/07, Lev Lafayette <lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au> wrote:    
Which is pretty much what I play (yes, I *do* use some
of MRQ - but not much).

This said, I don't think anyone includes "RuneQuest:
Slayers" here, verdade?

--- John Pare' < parejf63 at hotmail.com> wrote:  

I believe it shouldn't be included - I haven't looked at the rules since, well, probably the 90's but IIRC it had no mechanics in common with what I would call the 'true' RQ family.  



_______________________________________________
RQ-Rules mailing list
RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules



GBC's Portal to RQ & Glorantha: www.runequest.info - Ef plest master, this very fine grub!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20070731/07b33608/attachment-0001.html