Vedr. Re: Vedr. [Rq-rules]Signs & Portent

Wayne Shaw shaw at caprica.com
Tue Jul 31 11:19:41 PDT 2007


At 09:55 AM 7/31/2007, you wrote:
>Do you feel MRQ is part of the "true" RQ-family? I don't, but then I 
>don't consider bad RQ to be better than no RQ either.

I think getting into defining what's the "true" RQ family is 
tantamount to getting into religious niggling; MRQ is clearly RQ 
derived, and while I don't like what I've seen of it at all, 
excluding discussion of an RQ derived game called RuneQuest on a list 
called "RuneQuest Rules" that deals with multiple versions would be, 
to say the least, perverse.



More information about the RQ-Rules mailing list