Vedr. Re: Vedr. [Rq-rules]Signs & Portent

Peter Maranci pmaranci at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 14:44:03 PDT 2007


Oh, I'd never suggest *excluding* discussion of MRQ from the list - that
wouldn't make sense. Nor should any BRP-derived game be off limits, although
intense discussion of games such as CoC which have their own lists (there IS
a Call of Cthulhu list, isn't there?) should probably take place ON those
game-specific lists.  Likewise, I imagine that in-depth discussion of
Glorantha probably belongs on the Glorantha list rather than here.

Which is all just my opinion, of course, and you know what they say about
those. ;-)

I will admit that if this list fell under the control of Issaries or
Mongoose, I'd be inclined to sign off. But that's a very unlikely prospect -
right?

This thread has made me wonder...what if someone announced a plan to
commercially publish their own version of Glorantha "using different words",
and to release it under some type of OGL? The word "lawsuit" leaps to mind.
:D

->Peter

On 7/31/07, Wayne Shaw <shaw at caprica.com> wrote:
>
> At 09:55 AM 7/31/2007, you wrote:
> >Do you feel MRQ is part of the "true" RQ-family? I don't, but then I
> >don't consider bad RQ to be better than no RQ either.
>
> I think getting into defining what's the "true" RQ family is
> tantamount to getting into religious niggling; MRQ is clearly RQ
> derived, and while I don't like what I've seen of it at all,
> excluding discussion of an RQ derived game called RuneQuest on a list
> called "RuneQuest Rules" that deals with multiple versions would be,
> to say the least, perverse.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>

-- 
Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
The Diary of An Invisible Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20070731/a2508521/attachment-0001.html


More information about the RQ-Rules mailing list