[Rq-rules] MRQ "A Real Runequest Game"
Wayne Shaw
shaw at caprica.com
Tue Jul 31 17:01:52 PDT 2007
>Er, not so much. The changes between RQ and RQ II
>require a fanatic to know the difference (I believe
>the spelling of Glorantha and the use of d12 changed).
>RQIII was significantly different. RQIV was somewhat
>different to III, iirc. MRQ is very different. It's
>still in the family, but a very distant relation.
There were a few other things here and there, but you're correct that
the two editions were substantially the same.
> > Now, look at the changes in D&D, AD&D, AD&D
> > 2nd Ed, and 3.0, 3.5 and
> > god knows what they will do with the rumored 4.0.
>
>An interesting thing about D&D is that in each edition
>were improvements to the previous. I'm not sure one
>can say that MRQ is an improvement to RQ III or even
>I/II. Indeed, I am personally certain that it is not.
As someone who played OD&D at the time AD&D came out, I can't say I
considered much they'd done with it an improvement (AD&D2 and 3e were
a different story).
More information about the RQ-Rules
mailing list