[Rq-rules] The new One True Way

[Lev Lafayette]

--- Wayne Shaw <shaw at caprica.com> wrote:

> At 11:09 AM 8/1/2007, you wrote:
> >Am I going to be flamed for saying I'd like to see
> products of varying
> >quantity but volume rather than one perfect gem
> every 5 years? After all very
> >few products are so bad they have no use
> whatsoever, well apart from Daughters
> >of Darkness.
> >
> >I also think RQM/MRQ is flawed. I think since
> Lawrence Whitaker started
> >working for Mongoose it'll be fixed at the core,
> but that isn't the point.
> >It's good enough, and if you want to improve it
> then you can do so yourself as
> >house rules, or play RQ3/2/DBRP and use the
> material and stats from MRQ/RQM
> >publications.
> 
> Well, note that while I'm not an RQM fan, I don't
> hate its existance 
> like some people; I'm mostly just irritated that a
> number of us did 
> playtesting for some time and then were, as best I
> can determine, 
> pretty much ignored completely.  I don't expect a
> company to do 
> everything playtesters suggest, but this is the
> first time I've seen 
> a playtest list apparently utterly disregarded.

Do you remember the time when the author/designer just
disappeared off the list without warning? It was for
over a month.. Absolute classic that one, a real door
prize.

Yeah, the playtest experience could have been better.
Attention to what the playtesters were saying could
have generated a better game, much quicker and with
much less effort.

Regards,


Lev



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/