[Rq-rules] Thanks!

[Wayne Shaw]

At 07:57 AM 10/22/2007, you wrote:
>On 10/20/07, Bjorn Stolen 
><<mailto:stolenbjorn at hotmail.com>stolenbjorn at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Your example 2 seems to show a different understanding of the 
>consept of sr and reach of weapons. You don't like the 
>predictability of a long weapon acting before a slow weapon. IMHO, 
>the system only grants the weapon with the longest reach the option 
>of acting first; it's by no means a guarantee that it actually will do so.
>
>
>You keep quibbling at examples, but keep circling my main point: the 
>predictability of SR.

What you haven't explained is why it matters that much whether its 
predictable or not.  Its not like knowing whether you're going to hit 
first or second allows you some grand tactical advantage; _doing_ so 
can, but that's true whether its predictable or not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20071022/7edabfc8/attachment.html