[Rq-rules] Re: Classic Runequest: How would you do it?
Rick Meints
rjmeints at aol.com
Tue Dec 11 11:31:51 PST 2007
The ultimate linkage would be to run:
Borderlands, followed by a trip to Griffin Mountain, after which they return to Pavis, run through most of the scenarios except the Cradle, go through the Big Rubble, and then do the Cradle scenario.
Borderlands last scenario (7) has the PCs heading up to meet some people from Dykene, which provides the opportunity to go on into Balazar and the Elder Wilds. The PCs could adventure there for a while, build up some skills and such, and then head back down to Prax for loads of adventures in New Pavis and the Rubble before the Cradle arrives.
Regards,
Rick Meints
Message: 1
From: Lev Lafayette <lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au>
Subject: [Rq-rules] Classic RuneQuest: How Would You Do It?
To: "Discussion of RuneQuest rules." <rq-rules at crashbox.com>
A wee bit off-topic for a group dedicated to the
rules, but given the brains present... If you were to
run classic RuneQuest (i.e., the Borderlands, Pavis
and Big Rubble boxed sets) in a campaign for people
who are experienced roleplayers and have some RQ
experience, in what order would you do it?
At the moment, I am thinking doing all or most of the
Borderlands scenarios in succession then moving into
Pavis and alternating between the Pavis and Big Rubble
scenarios. Obviously the Cradles scenario comes last
because, well, that is so epic..
What say ye?
Lev
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20071211/cacb955f/attachment.html
More information about the RQ-Rules
mailing list