[Rq-rules] New Sorcery Spell

[Leon Kirshtein]

--- "Hibbs, Phil" <phil.hibbs at capgemini.com> wrote:
> Why 3x and 5x? How come this spell, which has the
> added advantage of waiting
> and then instantly countering an attack, is better
> than a spell that just
> counters the effect when cast? 
> 
> Anti-Damage 5 acts against a wound as a 15-point
> spell, whereas Neutralize
> Damage 5 only acts as a 5-point spell. Is this to
> compensate for Anti-X
> taking up Presence (or Duration if not using
> Sandy's)?

Neutralize spells you have the choice of then to cast
it and at what. With the Anti spell you are running
the risk of having your spell expended on something
minor at any time. The increase from x3 to x5 reflects
the usefulness vs increasingly smaller threat.

Leon


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping