[Rq-rules] Rules List needs a new home!

[Tomas Björklund]

Hi guys. Exiting lurker mode ...

I would like to put in a vote for a Google or yahoo hosted list, for the
simple reason that they are likely to be able to host it longer than any
individual. We would have our future archives at one single spot, instead of
spread out all over the place.

Putting my 2 c's in,

Tom.


On 3/12/08, Nick.Middleton at wrsl.com <Nick.Middleton at wrsl.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> >Andrew O. Mellinger wrote:
> >
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > >    Well the time is come and my current server is
> > > moving to a new
> > > host!  Also, I am not going to have time time to
> > > maintain the list
> > > any longer (not that I did much before).   Where
> > > should we move it?
> > > A google group?  Does someone else want to host?
> > >
> > >    I look forward to your thoughts!
> >
> >Peter Maranci wrote
> >
> > As long as it doesn't get taken over by Mongoose - or any company,
> > actually - I'll be happy. Although I have to say that I've liked
> > this format, and I hope the full archives will continue to be available.
> >
> > Thanks, Andrew, for the work you've done over the years for the list!
>
> First, let me join Peter in thanking you Andrew for all you've done over
> the years - it is very much appreciated!
>
> As to a new home for the list, I'd have to agree with Peter that an
> independent home would be my preference and whilst I have no substantive
> arguments against Google (or Yahoo) groups (lord knows, I'm subscribed to
> far too many Yahoo groups...), I think part of the character of this list
> derives from the fact that it's always been "independently" hosted, if
> that
> makes sense. So if someone such as Lev is willing to host the list and its
> archives and keep running in its current I'd say that would be ideal, at
> least from my point of view. Albeit I must confess I'm largely ignorant as
> to the effort and costs involved in hosting the list... :O
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick Middleton
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Any files attached to this e-mail will have been checked with virus
> detection software prior to transmission but you should carry out your own
> virus check before opening any attachment. WRSL does not accept liability
> for any damage or loss which may be caused by software viruses. The contents
> of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of WRSL and are intended
> for the confidential use by the named recipient only. They may be legally
> privileged and should not be communicated to, or relied upon, by any other
> person without written consent. If you are not the addressee, please notify
> us immediately at the following address:  Westinghouse Rail Systems Ltd
> (WRSL), PO Box 79, Pew Hill, Langley Park, Chippenham, Wiltshire, SN15 1JD -
> Tel 01249 441441
> Westinghouse Rail Systems Ltd  is a subsidiary of  Invensys
> Plc.  Registered office: Portland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF.
> Registered in England and Wales No. 1641421.
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20080312/cd86aaef/attachment.html