[Rq-rules] rq-rules or just runequest?

[Peter Maranci]

Well, I think that "RuneQuest Rules" expresses the historical purpose of
this list more accurately. That term includes rules systems which are
essentially RuneQuest, but don't go by that name - while "RuneQuest" might
be assumed to cover Mongoose "RuneQuest" only.

I'd vote for keeping our primary focus the rules system used by the
RuneQuest system and related systems. I'd hate to see the list turn into a
Glorantha discussion group. Like some others here, I have absolutely no use
for that setting!

->Peter

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Lev Lafayette <lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

> Hey people,
>
> I was just wondering if there was any strong feelings
> if the list name at the new host was simply called
> 'runequest' rather than 'rq-rules'?
>
> I understand there may have been historical reasons to
> differentiate between RuneQuest's default world
> (Glorantha) and RuneQuest the game system, but I'm not
> sure whether that is necessary anymore.
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Lev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
> http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>



-- 
Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
The Diary of An Invisible Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thinbits.net/pipermail/rq-rules/attachments/20080325/296029c0/attachment.html