Well, I'm probably not the only one who DID come from a wargaming background, and so the system was orrery-elegant to me, particularly after the hash of inconsistencies, rationalizations, and goofiness that was AD&D.<br>
<br>But you're right, the meticulous calculating of every last variable could get to be excessive, of course. All in perspective.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/24/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ashley Munday
</b> <<a href="mailto:aescleal@btinternet.com">aescleal@btinternet.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>If you're going to modify an attack chance just pull<br>some number out of the air that feels right, don't sod<br>about with all that "Well, he's on the ground so I get<br>+20%, It's dusk so I get -15%" Boring, boring,
<br>boring... if you want all that go play a wargame.<br><br></blockquote></div><br>